Cookie Consent by Free Privacy Policy website Document: Logging company sends police to terrorise village leader | Forests Portal

        INVESTIGATE.
        ANALYSE. EXPOSE.
THE COURT REPORT

LOGGING COMPANY SENDS POLICE TO
TERRORISE VILLAGE LEADER
         22 Nov 2018 | 6 min read



         In the afternoon of 13 February 2016, Flora Lakoya, her daughter, Paskaline, and
         grandchildren were confronted outside their rural home by a small group of armed men.

         Flora feared the gang were criminals. She told her daughter to run for cover in the
         plantation next to the house while she bravely picked up a spade. In fact, the men were
         police out of uniform. They were looking for Flora’s husband, Vitalis, who was asleep
         inside.

         The group of police threatened Flora with arrest if she did not reveal the whereabouts of
         her husband. When Vitalis came out of the house, the o      cer in charge drew a pistol. He
         aimed it at Vitalis’s leg and red.

         Luckily the shot missed Vitalis.

         But, the police then grabbed and attacked Vitalis in front of his terri ed wife and family.
         Vitalis was dragged to their vehicle and bundled inside.

         The o     cer with the pistol red two further shots in the air. Another policeman red his
         shotgun, warning Flora if she tried to come close she would be shot.

         As a result of the police beating he received outside his home and again later at the police
         station, Vitalis Lakoya su ered multiple lacerations and knife wounds to his face, hand
         and knee, bleeding from the ears, abrasions and bruising consistent with ‘severe police
         brutality’.

         We know these facts because in September this year, the policeman who red the pistol,
         Kasi Puring, the Commanding o        cer of Bravo Section Mobile Squad 19, was found guilty
         of unlawfully going armed to cause terror and assault occassioning actual bodily harm.

         But why was Vitalis Lakoya shot at and assaulted by a police squad in front of his wife,
         children and grandchildren?

         It certainly wasn’t because he was suspected of any crime or had a history of violence.
         Vitalis Lakoya is a respected and upstanding community elder.

         He was attacked by the armed police mobile squad and su ered his injuries because, as
         chairman of the local landowner company he had chosen to sign a logging agreement with
         a rival logging company of Cakara Alam Limited.

         Cakara Alam Limited is a Malaysian owned company. According to the judge, the police
         mobile squad were paid by the logging company to intimidate and attack Vitalis Lokoya.

         Indeed, the police mobile squad were not alone that night at the Lakoya’s home. Among
         the police o   cers was a civilian, one Walters Mallo. Mallo is a lawyer and an employee of
         Cakara Alam. He was described by the judge as an accomplice to the criminal o ences that
         occurred.

         The judge found the dispute between Cakara Alam and the landowner company was
         entirely civil in nature not a criminal matter. There was no justi cation for the police to
         even be at the home of Mr Lakoya.

         The judge was scathing of the evidence given by Mallo, who sought to absolve Puring of
         any responsibility by blaming other, unnamed o       cers for the assault. His evidence had
         ‘no ring of truth’ and was ‘lies’ said the court.

         The judge at sentencing concluded by saying, “it is a very serious matter when civil servants
         of the State, policemen, are engaged by private companies to in ict terror upon its own
         citizens”.

Page 1 screenshot
He imposed concurrent sentences of one year and two years imprisonment with hard
labour on the charges of going armed to cause fear and assault occasioning actual bodily
harm.

There is no record of any charges being brought against Walters Mallo or Cakara Alam
Limited despite their clear culpability in this corrupt scheme.




WHO IS CAKARA ALAM?
Cakara Alam (PNG) Limited is one of the oldest logging companies operating in Papua
New Guinea. It was rst registered in 1988.

Like most of its rivals, Cakara Alam is Malaysian owned. Since 2000, Cakara Alam has
been wholly owned by C.A. Investments Limited, a company registered in the secretive tax
haven of Labuan in Malaysia. C.A. Investments also owns Sumber Alam (PNG) Limited.

Despite their Malaysian ownership, Cakara Alam and Sumber Alam are both registered as
local companies in PNG. Both have two directors, both Malaysian, Chan Char Lee and Ee
Fei Lee.

Chan Char Lee also owns 50% of Tzen Paci c Limited, 50% of Landex Sawmilling Madang
Limited and one-third of Tzen Resources Limited. Another third of Tzen Resources is
owned by Ee Fei Lee. He also owns 50% of Tzen Lee Investments Limited. Chan Char Lee
and Ee Fei Lee also jointly own SPV Investments Limited, CA Machinery Limited
and Sumber Alam Mining (PNG) Limited.

Page 2 screenshot
According to log export monitoring company, SGS, another logging company, Tzen
Niugini Limited is also part of the Cakara Alam group.

According to IPA records, Tzen Niugini is owned by Kenlox Global Limited, another
company registered in a secretive tax haven, this time the British Virgin Islands. Both
Chan Char Lee and Ee Fei Lee have served as directors of Tzen Niugini Limited, but neither
are on the current board.

Cakara Alam (PNG) Ltd has logging operations at Central Arawe, East Arawe, West Arawe
and Rottock Bay, all in West New Britain.




Log export volumes by the Cakara Alam group of companies as recorded by SGS for the
12-months to July 2018

Its partner or subsidiary companies Tzen Niugini and Tzen Paci c have logging
operations at Illi Waswas in East New Britain and Aria Vanu in West New Britain.

In the twelve months to July 2018, Cakara Alam exported some 248,000 cubic metres of
logs from Papua New Guinea worth around US$24 million.




CAKARA ALAM GROUP




  ENTITY_EXTRACT-                ENTITY_EXTRACT-                 ENTITY_EXTRACT-
  SUMBER_ALAM_MINING_(PNG)_      SUMBER_ALAM_(PNG)_LIMITED       SPV_INVESTMENTS_LIMITED-
  LIMITED-1-104799               -1-49060                        1-104796




  ENTITY_EXTRACT-                ENTITY_EXTRACT-                 ENTITY_EXTRACT-
  LANDEX_SAWMILL_MADANG_LIM      CN_INDUSTRIES_LIMITED-1-        CA_MACHINERY_LIMITED-1-
  ITED-1-78014                   22600                           104798

Page 3 screenshot
  ENTITY_EXTRACT-                  ENTITY_EXTRACT-                ENTITY_EXTRACT-
  TZEN_NIUGINI_LIMITED-1-          TZEN_RESOURCES_LIMITED-1-      TZEN_PACIFIC_LIMITED-1-
  51276                            51286                          51051




  ENTITY_EXTRACT-                  ENTITY_EXTRACT-
  TZEN_LEE_INVESTMENTS_LIMI        CAKARA_ALAM_(PNG)_LTD.-1-
  TED-1-82609                      14078




AN ISOLATED INCIDENT OR WIDESPREAD ABUSE?
The attack on Vitalis Lakoya was not an isolated incident of violence against an innocent
civilian by a rogue police o   cer acting on the instructions of a Malaysian owned logging
company. The historical record shows it is just one more example of a much more
systemic problem.




Police mobile squads have a long history of terrorising innocent people on behalf
of logging companies

In 2013, a multi-agency report detailed how police o     cers working for the largest logging
company operating in PNG was brutalising communities in East New Britain.

Ten years earlier, in 2004, the Australian broadcaster, SBS, aired a documentary that
detailed allegations of serious police violence against citizens that was being sponsored by
logging companies. The program included testimony by a whistleblower from within the
Southern District Taskforce:



  “We bashed them up, we hit them with huge irons...I apologise for what I have done
  but I followed orders because I wanted bread and butter like any other employee.”



SBS had also detailed similar allegations in 2001:



  “The Papua New Guinea Police Force says it’s investigating numerous complaints
  that its police o   cers are acting as private enforcers for logging companies. Annie
  Kajir, who documented many of those complaints, says police are accused of
  threatening and brutalising landowners...... Even forcing some people into acts of
  bestiality. ‘Getting on their knees crawling with the gun at their back. Telling them to
  crawl so many distance. Being shot at in the presence of families, they haven’t done
  anything wrong, these are peaceful people living there with guns being red. Guns
  being carried around by un-uniformed policemen, ... telling people to carry dogs on
  their backs and to walk and to, you know, suck the dog’s, you know? Those are some

Page 4 screenshot
  of the allegations we have. Q. So serious abuses of human rights? A. Serious abuses of
  human rights.’”



Much more recently, in 2016, the Supreme Court refused to throw out a claim against
logging company Rimbunan Hijau that it was orchestrating police brutality. In that case
the complainant alleged he was thrown out of a three metre high window, threatened at
gun point, gun-butted, lashed with wooden sticks and a bulldozer fan belt, punched and
kicked and cut with a bush knife. –

In 2004, Masalai i Tokaut detailed police abuses on behalf of logging companies dating
back over the previous ve years. The sources for the allegations included leaked reports
from the National Intelligence Organisation.

In West Sepik Province, local people allege both the police and the army are used to
protect and defend illegal logging under Special Agriculture Business Leases, as explained
in this short video –


       SABL Stories - Police & Army used

Page 5 screenshot